|
|
Post by ctownvillian on Sept 21, 2006 18:05:41 GMT -6
well they might as well get ready to go against one great passing team when they meet up with PA not trying to look ahead or anything but did u read in AR GAZ. where the QB is 141 yards away for 10,000 for a career now that is impressive.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathwaldrop on Sept 21, 2006 19:49:56 GMT -6
There's some inflation there because of the system that Loucks is in, but at the very least it shows that he's an accurate passer, and that in itself is a big asset.
Crossett never in its history has faced an offense like PA's. The only teams that even would close would be Morrilton's in 2003 and Hamburg's in 1994-'97. Hamburg didn't run a genuine Spread because of the tight end in the base formation. Morrilton ran the Spread but wasn't terribly effective with it.
Facing PA is going to be something totally different for the Eagles but that's still quite a few weeks away. There are two other Little Rock teams to play before they get there.
|
|
|
|
Post by ctownvillian on Sept 22, 2006 19:08:01 GMT -6
half time and it is not looking good for the eagles. 22-0 but they did hold PR scorless in the second QRT.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathwaldrop on Sept 22, 2006 20:51:24 GMT -6
Played much better in quarters two, three and four, but didn't score enough. Offense inside the opposition's 30 has been a killer. Got to finish off those drives. Some of that is because of the failures in the running game.
Robinson is pretty good but not great. I don't see Robinson's taking PA. Second place, probably.
|
|
|
|
Post by Outlaw85 on Sept 23, 2006 11:40:03 GMT -6
Another winnable game. Take away the first quarter and you have a good game. Offense has got to find an identity fast! Are we spread ? Are we run? or both? We seem to run better out of the spread. Thats just a laymans observation.
|
|
|
|
Post by ctownvillian on Sept 23, 2006 11:59:17 GMT -6
i just hope that they figure out something fast
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. C on Sept 24, 2006 9:21:23 GMT -6
Seemed to me like the offense definitely improved when we switched to the spread in the 3rd quarter (I think that's when it was). I think we should go into the next game using it, because it seemed like we ran and passed better from it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Outlaw85 on Sept 24, 2006 11:34:42 GMT -6
Seemed to me like the offense definitely improved when we switched to the spread in the 3rd quarter (I think that's when it was). I think we should go into the next game using it, because it seemed like we ran and passed better from it. I agree with all the way. We moved the ball well out of the spread. Tunrovers killed us not Robinson when in the spread. |
|
|
|
Post by ctownvillian on Sept 24, 2006 15:45:13 GMT -6
how do we take a QB out that can throw the ball at least half teh field, alonf with the fact he has experice. okay not oding very good he is also runing for his life back there.
|
|
